Barr
is right about religion
BY
JAY AMBROSE
TRIBUNE
NEWS SERVICE
Attorney
General William Barr recently gave a speech on religious freedom at
the University of Notre Dame law school. He said that that mainstream
faiths were being attacked by secularists, mass media, academia,
movies, TV and the like, that our traditional moral system was being
degraded and that the traditional self-discipline of the past was
fleeing.
In no
time at all, he was proven correct. He was not attacked just by
atheists and know-nothing politicians, but by fellow Catholics of a
leftist persuasion and even a theological professor who said he was
threatening separation of church and state. Christians should not
carry their faith with them while exercising public duties, we were
told. They just might then disregard the rule of law, for instance,
and threaten the rights of nonbelievers.
Barr
dispelled that goofiness in what he actually said. He does not want
government insisting on any faith. He wants religious freedom. He
wants limited government that becomes more possible as we get the
kind of moral discipline and virtue that the Judeo-Christian
tradition instills. When people behave decently, they can be counted
on to govern themselves. They do not need of a cop on every corner or
bureaucratic enthusiasm for rules that enclose our lives instead of
opening them.
But,
oh dear, some say, Christians of the Barr kind will heed moral
notions that transform our democracy into a theocracy. I wonder if
these superiors among us know what Christian morals actually are: if
they understand, for instance, what Paul said when he talked about
love and described its elements: patience, kindness, humility,
calmness, delight in truth, perseverance in helping others, hope and
letting one’s life revolve around something bigger than self.
Now let’s
turn to secular morals.
Relativity
is a biggie. No moral truth is absolutely true, some secularists tell
us, and you wonder if they ever heard of the philosopher who asked if
it is then sometimes OK to torture a baby to death for the fun of it?
We get multiculturalism that tells us all cultures are equal in their
values even though we know some cultures approve of killing
homosexuals, adulteresses and people of other faiths. We have
utilitarians who are willing to dismiss some evils if they make large
numbers of people happy, and we know this can be a terror. We have
political correctness that often sees the trivial as momentous and
sometimes punishes transgressions by ruining lives.
All of
this gets complicated. But it is not complicated to say that someone
heeding basic religious precepts is ordinarily going to be far less
dangerous to democracy than, say, Sen. Bernie Sanders and his
historically catastrophic aspirations for governmental envelopment.
Though not generally recognized, Christianity has been a major force
in giving us science, universities, liberty and the values that still
instruct to at least some extent the values of nonbelievers. Though
the New Atheists say religion gives us war, research indicates that
no more than 10% of wars have some religious connection.
None of
this is meant to say that no horrors have been committed in the name
of religion or that religious people are ipso facto better than the
non-religious. Most Christians recognize their own sinfulness. But it
is the case that religion is in steep decline in America today and
that the consequences could be the loss of meaning and of what has
made us great. The sociologist Charles Murray has shown for instance
that the most constant churchgoers among us are the upper middle
class and that the working class is suffering mightily from the
communal help and guidance that came from churches dying out where
they live.
Hurrah
for Barr.
No comments:
Post a Comment